0.07/0.13 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_26774 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:49:09 EDT 2023 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CVCUCaBpFF/Vampire---4.8_26774 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # new_bool_9 with pid 26953 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_9 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0) 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 26961 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0) 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # Proof found! 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_22, type, cQ: a > a > $o). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: a > a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_27, type, esk4_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_28, type, esk5_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_29, type, esk6_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_30, type, esk7_0: a). 0.21/0.49 thf(cTHM559A_pme, conjecture, (((![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ X2)=>(cQ @ X2 @ X1)))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ X3)<=((cQ @ X2 @ X3)&(cQ @ X1 @ X2)))))&![X1:a]:((cQ @ X1 @ X1)))<=?[X4:a > a > $o]:(![X1:a]:(((?[X3:a]:((X4 @ X1 @ X3))&(X4 @ X1 @ X1))&![X5:a]:((![X2:a]:(((X4 @ X1 @ X2)<=>(cQ @ X5 @ X2)))<=(X4 @ X1 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CVCUCaBpFF/Vampire---4.8_26774', cTHM559A_pme)). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((?[X4:a > a > $o]:(![X1:a]:(((?[X3:a]:((X4 @ X1 @ X3))&(X4 @ X1 @ X1))&![X5:a]:(((X4 @ X1 @ X5)=>![X2:a]:(((X4 @ X1 @ X2)<=>(cQ @ X5 @ X2))))))))=>((![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ X2)=>(cQ @ X2 @ X1)))&![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:((((cQ @ X2 @ X3)&(cQ @ X1 @ X2))=>(cQ @ X1 @ X3))))&![X1:a]:((cQ @ X1 @ X1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM559A_pme])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:a, X20:a, X21:a]:(((((epred1_0 @ X18 @ (esk1_1 @ X18))&(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X18))&((~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X21)|(cQ @ X20 @ X21)|~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20))&(~(cQ @ X20 @ X21)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X21)|~(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20))))&(((((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))&((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&(~(cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&((((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))&((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))&(~(cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0)|~(cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)|~(cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cQ @ X3 @ X2)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ X2)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:((cQ @ X1 @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a, X1:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X2)|~((cQ @ X1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|(cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(cQ @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_11])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_12])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|(cQ @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (cQ @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_4]), c_0_18])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_19])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk3_0)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_21])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_22])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk5_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_23])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk7_0 @ esk7_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a, X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk3_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_24])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ X1 @ esk6_0)|~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((cQ @ esk4_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_7])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cQ @ esk3_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_4])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ~((cQ @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_4]), c_0_30])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_4]), c_0_32]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 3 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 10 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 84 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 11 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 73 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 12 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 18 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 160 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 152 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 160 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 37 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 33 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 27 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 113 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 40 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 536 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 452 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 84 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2988 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.000 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.010 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting 0.21/0.49 EOF